Open ajschumacher opened 4 years ago
This "mokita" idea is sort of related, but closer to "elephant in the room," it sounds like: https://www.joshuakennon.com/mokita-the-truth-we-know-but-agree-not-to-talk-about/ (heard about this in "Fierce Foundations" training)
Possibly related: A prediction (as in Foundation, or regarding the stock market) may "undo" itself if it is widely known, which is then an incentive to secrecy.
Myth of the Rational Voter talks about how politicians may pretend to believe in bad but popular policies… see chapter 7
Abilene paradox
pulling up from https://planspace.org/2012/12/29/highlights-from-this-will-make-you/
Kafabe (Eric Weinstein) "an altered reality of layered falsehoods, in which nothing can be assumed to be as it appears"
He doesn't provide a better definition, I think, but the example that makes it clear is professional wrestling, in which everybody acts as if there's real competition but in fact the whole thing is planned. Maybe kayfabe is a specific case of Robert Trivers' entry in WWBBCP ("deceit and self-deception play a big role in human problems"), and then perhaps kakonomics is a specific case of kayfabe. Oh what a tangled web we weave?
Sort of related: when you can’t or won’t say what helped you succeed: https://www.atvbt.com/the-carrot-problem/
Not quite secrets; in fact often people assume that everyone (or some people of interest) all know (whether that's true or not).
Example from The Tyranny of Metrics, page 164, on a thing that is known but not acknowledged, which might be a good way to phrase this whole idea:
And maybe that book's whole Chapter 14 ("Excursus") called "When transparency is the enemy of performance: Politics, diplomacy, intelligence, and marriage." I'm not sure I agree completely, but it's an interesting discussion.
Muller quotes "Concealment and Revelation: Esotericism in Jewish Thought and its Philosophical Implications" by Moshe Halbertal a couple times, and it seems like that book could be interesting.