Open ajschumacher opened 4 years ago
Design reading assignments that require students to actively process the text. Many concrete strategies have been suggested for helping students to get more out of reading that likely have some or all of their effect by making readers think about the meaning of what they are reading. Techniques such as writing outlines, self-examination during learning, review questions, and previews can encourage or require students to integrate the material and to thereby process (i.e., think about) the meaning. These different techniques are more or less effective in different situations, perhaps due to the specific materials being studied (e.g., McDaniel & Einstein, 1989); general principles guiding when each technique should be used have not been forthcoming. Nevertheless, although one technique or another may be more effective for a given lesson or group of students, using any strategy that encourages the processing of meaning is almost always better than not using one.
building a network - find people to talk to, including the author of the book!
Don’t just read it; fight it! Ask your own questions, look for your own examples, discover your own proofs. Is the hypothesis necessary? Is the converse true? What happens in the classical special case? What about the degenerate cases? Where does the proof use the hypothesis? (Paul Halmos, “I want to be a mathematician”)
quoted at https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/ask-yourself-dumb-questions-and-answer-them/
pulling from Google books:
also from Paul Halmos, “I want to be a mathematician” there's a neat bit on taking notes and then filling in details afterward
posted ova hea: Take notes like Paul Halmos https://planspace.org/20201124-take_notes_like_paul_halmos/
didn't Benjamin Franklin or Thomas Jefferson or one of those guys study by re-writing other people's essays?
Relate to Terry Tao's "Ask yourself dumb questions – and answer them!" https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/ask-yourself-dumb-questions-and-answer-them/ and Martin A. Schwartz's "The importance of stupidity in scientific research" https://jcs.biologists.org/content/121/11/1771.full
checking (and building) your understanding, getting clarity on what is known and what isn't
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQ3R survey question read recite review
See also: #198 #208
the distinguishing characteristic of a textbook is that it makes its outline explicit
(rather than making you figure it out)
This is probably related to #213...
See also #230 (spaced repetition) for things that relate...
"It's been said before and often, but it cannot be overemphasized: study actively. Don't just read it; fight it! Ask your own questions, look for your own examples, discover your own proofs. Is the hypothesis necessary? Is the converse true? What happens in the classical special case? What about the degenerate cases? Where does the proof use the hypothesis?" (page 69, Halmos, I want to be a mathematician)
maybe this fits here?
Why textbooks count, by Tim Oates https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/181744-why-textbooks-count-tim-oates.pdf
How to Study in College by Walter Pauk and Ross J.Q. Owens https://www.amazon.com/How-Study-College-Walter-Pauk/dp/1133960782 recommended by Haizia via email
hmm!
https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Crit_Thinking.pdf
to review: https://www.aft.org/periodical/american-educator/summer-2003/ask-cognitive-scientist-students-rememberwhat