Some new label suggestions for source inspection/classification

[taramurphy]

I think you could generalise your labels, without making it too complex, if you keep the red/green/yellow/grey coding as some overall "good" "investigate" "problem we understand". But then have different buttons with more specific labels.

Some examples so far:

• “extended/diffuse in SUMSS” as a reason why there is no match for an ASKAP source, e.g.: http://ada.physics.usyd.edu.au:8005/image/3/askapnotseen/180 (GREEN/OK)

• “too close to bright source” as a reason, e.g.: http://ada.physics.usyd.edu.au:8005/image/3/askapnotseen/181 (GREEN/OK)

• “there is a match” , e.g.: http://ada.physics.usyd.edu.au:8005/image/3/askapnotseen/188 (GREEN/OK)

• “SUMSS non-detection” as a reason for something like this: http://ada.physics.usyd.edu.au:8005/image/3/askapnotseen/191 (RED/INVESTIGATE)

• “edge of field” http://ada.physics.usyd.edu.au:8005/image/2/largeratio/189 (GREY/PROBLEM) or (GREEN/OK)

• "out of range of mosaic": http://ada.physics.usyd.edu.au:8005/image/3/sumssnomatch/370 (GREY/PROBLEM)

[ajstewart]

Attached are the buttons after updating. Will leave this issue open in case of further discussion.

For purposes of text only viewing the buttons are:

• There is a match (ignore/green)
• SUMSS Extended/Diffuse (ignore/green)
• Close to bright source (ignore/green)
• ASKAP Double (ignore/green)
• Not sure (help/amber)
• SUMSS Non-detection (investigate/red)
• ASKAP Non-detection (investigate/red)
• Edge of field (problem/grey)
• Out of range (problem/grey)
• SUMSS artefact (problem/grey)
• ASKAP artefact (problem/grey)

[ajstewart]

Consider 'Faint Source' green button or "Non-detection" for when the source being matched itself is not really a valid source.

[ajstewart]

Updated in #40. Leaving open for other potential suggestions.