Open gallofeliz opened 5 years ago
Please add a specific example that you expect to work.
Something like :
var source = {
type: 'object',
properties: {
parking: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
cars: {
type: 'array',
items: { $ref: '#/definitions/car' }
}
}
}
},
definitions: {
car: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
color: {
type: 'string'
}
}
}
}
}
var with = {
type: 'object',
properties: {
cage: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
birds: {
type: 'array',
items: { $ref: '#/definitions/bird' }
}
}
}
},
definitions: {
bird: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
color: {
type: 'string'
}
}
}
}
}
var final = {
$merge: {
source,
with
}
}
yes, definitions have to be outside of the merge (and you can use merge inside definitions
yes, definitions have to be outside of the merge (and you can use merge inside definitions
Is there an example anywhere of how this looks? I've tried the following (mock example) but it doesn't seem to work. Do I have definitions
at the correct level (parallel to $merge
) ?
{
"id": "lixi-internal-request-custom",
"$merge": {
"source": { "$ref": "lixi-internal-request" },
"with": {
"properties": {}
}
},
"definitions": {
"ID": {
"pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9_][a-zA-Z0-9-_.]*$"
}
}
}
Sorry but this is nothing logic. I did want to merge to entities, if I need to put definitions in another section, I do the merge myself ... And in the last case it's the same, to have définitions of a $ref is understandable as $ref should declare its own definitions.
Sorry but Not Logic.
Le jeu. 14 nov. 2019 03:28, Nathan Winch notifications@github.com a écrit :
yes, definitions have to be outside of the merge (and you can use merge inside definitions
Is there any example anywhere of how this looks? I've tried the following (mock example) but it doesn't seem to work. Do I have definitions at the correct level (parallel to $merge) ?
{ "id": "lixi-internal-request-custom", "$merge": { "source": { "$ref": "lixi-internal-request" }, "with": { "properties": {} } }, "definitions": { "ID": { "pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9-.]*$" } } }
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv-merge-patch/issues/28?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJU4UFQNKHYOBVQDKA5EAPTQTSZWHA5CNFSM4GOOWL4KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEEALQHA#issuecomment-553695260, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJU4UFQSW5VW3MO23RN4XNTQTSZWHANCNFSM4GOOWL4A .
Hi,
When the "with" object contains definitions (like '"$ref": "#/definitions/JwtConfig"'), ajv throws an error.
I need to move the "with" "definitions" property to the main object :
I think it's an issue :)
Regards