About the tf_records_human36m and neutrMosh/neutrSMPL_H3.6?

[ChenyuGao]

My question is: In the neutrMosh/neutrSMPL_H3.6 dataset and your processed tf_records_human36m, the SMPL pose's first 3 parameters are different. How to process it?

Below is what the author answered me: Quick answer is that those are two different mosh is in global coordinate space while the individual TF records for human 3.6m are in the camera coordinate frame. I think I rotated it using the provided camera information from human3.6m. You can also do it by solving the procrustes problem between the meshes to figure out the alignment.

[mariolew]

Hi @ChenyuGao, Did you figure out how to rotate? I use the camera information from https://github.com/una-dinosauria/3d-pose-baseline , but the rotated result is wrong.

[ChenyuGao]

Use the function as follows which is provided by the author in another issue. Input is the pose parameters from neutrMosh/neutrSMPL_H3.6 dataset, then you can get the right pose as the original image (every 5 frames)

def rectify_pose(pose):
    """
    Rectify "upside down" people in global coord
    Args:
        pose (72,): Pose.
    Returns:
        Rotated pose.
    """
    pose = pose.copy()
    R_mod = cv2.Rodrigues(np.array([np.pi, 0, 0]))[0]
    R_root = cv2.Rodrigues(pose[:3])[0]
    new_root = R_root.dot(R_mod)
    pose[:3] = cv2.Rodrigues(new_root)[0].reshape(3)
    return pose

[mariolew]

@ChenyuGao Thanks.

[yifengji]

do you have the neutrSMPL_H3.6 tar?can you send to me?my email address is yifengji1020@163.com,thanks

[dangpugui]

Hello,may I ask you for the neutrSMPL_H3.6 tar? I would be grateful if you could give it to me.My email address is chenjj954@163.com.

[akanazawa]

Unfortunately I cannot distribute that data anymore due to licensing reasons.

Thanks,

Angjoo

On Jun 13, 2019, at 8:26 PM, dangpugui notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello,may I ask you for the neutrSMPL_H3.6 tar? I would be grateful if you could give it to me.My email address is chenjj954@163.com.

— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[dangpugui]

I am gold to receive your reply, does this mean that the training code will not work properly?

In fact, when I train without the H3.6M dataset, the code would always get stuck at this step.

---Original--- From: "akanazawa"notifications@github.com Date: 2019/6/14 12:12:40 To: "akanazawa/hmr"hmr@noreply.github.com; Cc: "dangpugui"153254904@qq.com;"Comment"comment@noreply.github.com; Subject: Re: [akanazawa/hmr] About the tf_records_human36m and neutrMosh/neutrSMPL_H3.6? (#75)

Unfortunately I cannot distribute that data anymore due to licensing reasons.

Thanks,

Angjoo

On Jun 13, 2019, at 8:26 PM, dangpugui notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello,may I ask you for the neutrSMPL_H3.6 tar? I would be grateful if you could give it to me.My email address is chenjj954@163.com.

— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[akanazawa]

Well the training code can still work, you just have to take out human3.6m from the command, something like:

CMD="python -m src.main --d_lr 1e-4 --e_lr 1e-5 --log_img_step 1000 --pretrained_model_path=${PRETRAINED} --data_dir ${DATA_DIR} --e_loss_weight 60. --batch_size=64 --use_3d_label True --e_3d_weight 60. --datasets lsp,lsp_ext,mpii,coco,mpi_inf_3dhp --epoch 75 --log_dir logs" But yes it will change the performance, should approach that of weakly-supervised setting (no explicitly 2D-to-3D pair) in the paper.

Best,

Angjoo

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:54 PM dangpugui notifications@github.com wrote:

I am gold to receive your reply, does this mean that the training code will not work properly?

In fact, when I train without the H3.6M dataset, the code would always get stuck at this step.

---Original--- From: "akanazawa"notifications@github.com Date: 2019/6/14 12:12:40 To: "akanazawa/hmr"hmr@noreply.github.com; Cc: "dangpugui"153254904@qq.com;"Comment"comment@noreply.github.com; Subject: Re: [akanazawa/hmr] About the tf_records_human36m and neutrMosh/neutrSMPL_H3.6? (#75)

Unfortunately I cannot distribute that data anymore due to licensing reasons.

Thanks,

Angjoo

On Jun 13, 2019, at 8:26 PM, dangpugui notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello,may I ask you for the neutrSMPL_H3.6 tar? I would be grateful if you could give it to me.My email address is chenjj954@163.com.

— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/akanazawa/hmr/issues/75?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAHBXWBEHSQQEUUDLXU7DBTP2M6DVA5CNFSM4G4MCCVKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXV4VTI#issuecomment-501992141, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHBXWGJUUR2YQ72RZPA5I3P2M6DVANCNFSM4G4MCCVA .

[ozhyo]

Could you please send the neutrSMPL_H3.6 dataset and the tf_records_human36m dataset to me? They are necessary for reproducing the results. I would appreciate it if you can share them with me. Thanks a lot! My e-mail address is marvelzhy@gmail.com

[Vegetebird]

do you have the neutrSMPL_H3.6 tar? can you send to me?my email address is [781256005@qq.com]

[LightOfMonet]

do you have the neutrSMPL_H3.6 tar? can you send to me?my email address is [474186834@qq.com]

[Qusong1]

Could you please send the neutrSMPL_H3.6 dataset and the tf_records_human36m dataset to me? They are necessary for reproducing the results. I would appreciate it if you can share them with me. Thanks a lot! My e-mail address is marvelzhy@gmail.com

hello, i also need the tf_records_human3.6M datasets for evaluation, if you have got it could you share with me, thank you very much! my email address is 1849535352@qq.com

[akanazawa]

Unfortunately the authors fo H36M do not want those files to be distributed, I recommend you folks to check out the newer version of HMR, which doesn't use any of this data and works much better: https://shubham-goel.github.io/4dhumans/

On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 12:30 AM Qusong1 @.***> wrote:

Could you please send the neutrSMPL_H3.6 dataset and the tf_records_human36m dataset to me? They are necessary for reproducing the results. I would appreciate it if you can share them with me. Thanks a lot! My e-mail address is @.***

hello, i also need the tf_records_human3.6M datasets for evaluation, if you have got it could you share with me, thank you very much! my email address is @.***

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/akanazawa/hmr/issues/75#issuecomment-1574747409, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHBXWAV2JFEUGO7AEM2VCDXJLR2LANCNFSM4G4MCCVA . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>

-- Angjoo Kanazawa Assistant Professor Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~kanazawa/ She/Her

[jjh6297]

Dooray! 메일 발송 실패 안내

메일 발송 실패 안내

@.***) 님께 보낸 메일이 전송되지 못하였습니다.

      실패 사유를 확인해보세요.

        * 받는 사람 : 

@.***)

        * 발송 시간 : 

2023-06-07T03:40:01

        * 메일 제목 : 

Re: [akanazawa/hmr] About the tf_records_human36m and neutrMosh/neutrSMPL_H3.6? (#75)

            * 실패 사유 : 

받는 사람의 메일함 용량이 가득 찼습니다. 받는 사람에게 메일함 정리를 요청하신 후 다시 발송해 보세요.

      이 메일은 발신전용으로 회신되지 않습니다.
      더 궁금하신 사항은
      ***@***.***
      으로 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

    © Dooray!.

[StevenGrove]

Could I please get the NeutrSMPL_H3.6 dataset for my research? It's really important for my work. My email is ildtechtop@gmail.com. Thanks a lot!!!