Open Zblocker64 opened 1 week ago
SDL I am using
---
version: "2.0"
services:
satisfactory-server:
image: wolveix/satisfactory-server:latest
expose:
- port: 7777
as: 7777
proto: udp
to:
- global: true
env:
- SERVERGAMEPORT=7777
- MAXPLAYERS=8
- PGID=1000
- PUID=1000
- ROOTLESS=false
- STEAMBETA=false
params:
storage:
data:
mount: /config
readOnly: false
profiles:
compute:
satisfactory-server:
resources:
cpu:
units: 8
memory:
size: 32GB
storage:
- size: 10GB
- name: data
size: 15GB
attributes:
persistent: true
class: beta3
placement:
dcloud:
pricing:
satisfactory-server:
denom: uakt
amount: 100000
deployment:
satisfactory-server:
dcloud:
profile: satisfactory-server
count: 1
using kubectl describe pod ...
this is the output of that container.
Containers:
satisfactory-server:
Container ID: containerd://4e209da0b195a487f9e8148625851c2b38f1f30ae9ad5069687b180b416e5260
Image: wolveix/satisfactory-server:latest
Image ID: docker.io/wolveix/satisfactory-server@sha256:d5e93211f497369e90aa5404c268428f27c4e9db3485601a1b1265437fd02720
Port: 7777/TCP
Host Port: 0/TCP
State: Running
Started: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:10:15 -0500
Ready: True
Using my own provider to test
Also tested with this SDL created by a member of the core team
---
version: "2.0"
services:
softether:
image: andrey01/softether:4.38-9760-2
expose:
- port: 80
as: 80
to:
- global: true
- port: 443
as: 443
to:
- global: true
- port: 992
as: 992
to:
- global: true
- port: 5555
as: 5555
to:
- global: true
- port: 1194
as: 1194
proto: udp
to:
- global: true
- port: 500
as: 500
proto: udp
to:
- global: true
- port: 4500
as: 4500
proto: udp
to:
- global: true
profiles:
compute:
softether:
resources:
cpu:
units: 1.0
memory:
size: 512Mi
storage:
size: 512Mi
placement:
akash:
signedBy:
anyOf:
- "akash1365yvmc4s7awdyj3n2sav7xfx76adc6dnmlx63"
- "akash18qa2a2ltfyvkyj0ggj3hkvuj6twzyumuaru9s4"
pricing:
softether:
denom: uakt
amount: 10000
deployment:
softether:
akash:
profile: softether
count: 1
Result on provider side
Containers:
softether:
Container ID: containerd://d2ad776f5357dadbd48c941c30ca82d502672b660d5f7fb8ef7a3830eb69e350
Image: andrey01/softether:4.38-9760-2
Image ID: docker.io/andrey01/softether@sha256:cacb7cca5598abe74dbb2370f9246d0def7dc85531ad56e322a5bd87426df5bb
Ports: 80/TCP, 443/TCP, 500/TCP, 992/TCP, 1194/TCP, 4500/TCP, 5555/TCP
Host Ports: 0/TCP, 0/TCP, 0/TCP, 0/TCP, 0/TCP, 0/TCP, 0/TCP
State: Running
Started: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:14:08 -0500
Ready: True
This is not a UDP issue, it is an issue of forwarding both TCP and UDP on the same port.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Yes. While we can request UDP ports, they are not being assigned correctly.
Describe the solution you'd like
Allow both TCP and UDP ports to be assigned correctly
Describe alternatives you've considered
Nothing can go around this as far as I know
Search
Code of Conduct
Additional context
No response