Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I took a look at the pattern you are trying to run. Because you commented out
the
decrease line, you are telling the pattern to increase the number of stitches
on the
needle exponentially. After one repeat you'd have 73 sts, after the 2nd 217 sts,
after the 3rd 647, etc. It can handle 20 repeats, and maybe even 58 repeats if
your
gauge is 1 row per inch.
I'll write out how many repeats are calculated to the log for a future release.
Original comment by fiddlerpianist@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2010 at 8:56
Forgot to finish that sentence... "It can handle 20 repeats, and maybe even 58
repeats if your gauge is 1 row per inch..." but much after that, the program
quickly
runs out of memory as it tries to track millions of stitches. My test bombed at
around 60,000 stitches.
Original comment by fiddlerpianist@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2010 at 4:21
that makes sense, I forgot that because I wasn't using the decrease that I was
constantly adding stitches, and that knitml attempts to actually "knit" the
project
-- hence it ran out of space.
Makes perfect sense as to why it happened.
Original comment by jessica.sant
on 30 Mar 2010 at 4:26
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jessica.sant
on 19 Mar 2010 at 1:11