is there any reason you don't add (non-propensity) matching?

akelleh / causality

Tools for causal analysis

MIT License

1.06k stars 128 forks source link

is there any reason you don't add (non-propensity) matching? #72

Open Casyfill opened 5 years ago

Casyfill commented 5 years ago

Just wondering - do you think this is a wrong package to add feature distance matching / standardized mean diff/propensity scores? I will be happy to PR.

I know there is another package (just one?!), causal_inference, but can't say I like their dict-based approach

link