Hello,
Currently the documentation says about json_int_t that "It represents the widest integer type available on your system." So by definition it's supposed to be equivalent to intmax_t. However, long long is not guaranteed to be equivalent to intmax_t. We should simply typedef json_int_t as an alias to intmax_t and forget about the nonsense of whether it's a long or long long.
Hello, Currently the documentation says about
json_int_tthat "It represents the widest integer type available on your system." So by definition it's supposed to be equivalent tointmax_t. However,long longis not guaranteed to be equivalent tointmax_t. We should simply typedefjson_int_tas an alias tointmax_tand forget about the nonsense of whether it's alongorlong long.