Closed rube-de closed 1 year ago
Some comment: I would not include the name of the token in the domain separator. It is not guaranteed to be unique, so it does not help much. At the same time, it can be changed, which can be very confusing. I would remove it from the separator.
Looks good to me. Feel free to merge.
This looks good.
Question is: should we go for the alternative "uniswap" style approach that keeps the smart contract smaller, but has more overhead when processing a permit.