Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Jianwei 'Chris' Leng <Chris.Leng@utah.edu>
confirmed:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
I just released a new version 1.007+3
(/dropbox/ehost-sharing/ehost-stable/ehost1.007-plus3) for your issues. It has
following modifications compared to previous stable version.
1. Links the right annotation when creating relationship under adjudication
mode.
When creating relationship in adjudication mode, it will link the correct
adjudicated annotation to your selected annotation.
2. Prevent annotation data lossing in the XML output in the "adjudication"
folder
In previous version, says I have annotation Ann1 which has a relationship
linked to annotation Ann2, then the Ann1 will be pointed to Ann2 via its old
"mention id" in the adjudication XML even after Ann2 are adjudicated.
Actually, Ann2 are not existing in the XML output as it has been instead of a
new "ADJUDICATION" annotation.
Functions are added for this situation.
3. Update Relationship display after related annotations are adjudicated.
Says we have annotation Ann1 linked to Ann2, and Ann2 are overlapping with Ann3
and Ann4. The screen should tell us the Ann1 are linked to Ann3 after we
accepted Ann3 in our adjudication operations.
Functions are added for this.
These modifications also need to be added to the beta version. I will put new
issues for them on the googlecodes site and schedule new tasks.
Original comment by jwleng@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2012 at 9:55
<1>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Problem 4: it draws the unadjudicated annotation while draw the relationship
path on result editor.
It's in processing.
<2>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
issue 281 is raised for apply the similar modification to the beta version.
Original comment by jwleng@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2012 at 9:59
Problem 4 (issue 280.4) is fixed on eHOST 1.007+4 version.
Original comment by jwleng@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2012 at 8:52
Original comment by jwleng@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2012 at 6:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jwleng@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2012 at 9:54