Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I've used the FMK on DD-WRT WRT160N's before, so the firmware should be
supported. The firmware update may have just gotten corrupted - it happens
sometimes, even with factory supplied firmware images. If the device's
bootloader was corrupted or it doesn't provide a fail-safe recovery mode, you
will need to get lower-level access to the device in order to restore the
device to a working state, either via a serial port, JTAG, or a flash
programmer. Unfortunately, there isn't much the FMK can do to help you at this
point.
Original comment by heffne...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2012 at 11:55
WRT160N != WRT160NL... very different routers (Atheros vs. Broadcom, Linux vs.
VXWorks, etc.)
I'm currently having a similar problem with WRT160NLs (not done trying yet,
though!)
Original comment by AriXm...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2012 at 12:13
Yes, but A) the WRT160N I have runs Linux (FMk doesn't support non-linux
firmware) and B) the chipset, in and of itself, should not affect FMK's ability
to extract the firmware. Besides, he's running it against a DD-WRT firmware,
which generally uses the same file format, squashfs utilities, firmware
headers, etc across devices.
Unless there is some other more detailed information that can be provided, iand
f the *ng scripts were successful with no errors/warnings as the original bug
report stated, and the router accepted the firmware indicating that the
firmware headers and checksums were properly modified (which it obviously did),
I would suspect that it's not an issue with FMK.
But again, if someone can provide more detailed information that indicates
otherwise, I'll be more than happy to re-open the issue and investigate.
Original comment by heffne...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2012 at 4:34
It does seem true that it should work for any WRT160N version that is running
linux and compatible with DD-WRT images for that device. Like the WRT54G, I'm
guessing some older versions run linux, some versions don't, and now they have
the WRT160NL to indicate the linux version. I doubt I will personally get
around to evaluating this, but Craig might if he has time. I'm currently heavy
into issuing two major updates for Process Lasso and PECompact, so that's too
much to keep me busy as is.
Original comment by jeremy.collake@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2012 at 11:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
felixlok...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 8:13