katoss
commented
4 years ago Original user testing feedback
The instruction “Talk about any experience in your daily life”:
- A D d: “The question [‘Talk about any experience in your daily life’] needs to be more highlighted, because I didn’t really understand right away what information you were looking for.”
Interface/Design
- A D d: “The ‘talk about any experience in your life’ needs to be bolder, because you don’t see it right away.”
- P d: “This form doesn’t reflect any sort of achievements in visual representation made for autistic people, I mean, when design encourages you to think. When it is not only words, which tell you what to do and what the person is looking for, but also some visuals, like something that helps.”
- P d: “You could have a face which could indicate ‘Imagine a situation in your daily life, when some experience has happened’ and you could have a thinking face next to it. Or when you go ‘Where, what..’, you could also provide some pictures indicating location or indicating ‘experience’. On the very basic level it could be like the PECS, the picture language used for autistic people. I don’t really like PECS very much, I think they are not very attractive. But the idea is that you add more visuals rather than overload it with words.” → in the sense of “text being complemented by visuals”
- P i: “In my family, autism is high-functioning, so we don’t need serious accommodations. But we did need help with speech and all of that. But the thing is that the senses of my children are different to some extent. So for them, to get the maximum out of information, it is best when they use as many senses as they possibly can. So when you read the text, one brain area is activated, when you look at pictures, another area. If there is voice explanation, it would be a third one. The more resilient the form is, the more ‘avenues’ it uses, the better.”
- A (2) d: “I guess what is in dark blue is active.” (when inspecting the buttons ‘upload’ and ‘non-verbal’)
- A (2) d: “The upload images-function should be more within it [the input form]. Because when it is within it, it implies ‘add more specificity’ to what you have written. When it is outside, it looks like you are changing the accessibility settings of this page.”
- A C d: “The navy is just a shade too dark. It is sort of making me think: ‘What are you? You are not black, not blue. [...] If it was a shade that was more towards a royal navy, that would be better.”
→ Apart from some smaller design issues regarding the interface, visuals or voice should be added to make the form easier accessible.
ghost
As a Fujitsu developer
I would like A wireframe design and justification that showcases a improvement to the experience page with the integration of voice to text accessibility panel - and changes to make the form more accessible. Addition of text being complemented by visuals.
Make talk about any experience in your life bolder - highlight it. Add more visuals to help the core Autistic User for Where, What, How - face imaging a situation - thinking face next to it for example reference PECS or suitable icons.
Create a hover on the Submit Media (Upload) button and make it more interactive. Make the navy used lighter - ref royal navy, provide a series of colour swatches for royal navy for review.
Because... I would like show to the wider community a Fujitsu design concept for the platform.
Acceptance criteria Axure updated with the final UI design for the component A picture/screenshot image of the final UI design of the component held within Axure Justification of the component design available in Github repository as an .md file
Other relevant documents: Values Ways of working Data management
Review owner: Internal development team Alan Turing
User Feedback Labels: Enter Experience Page Interface Design Colour Upload