ibicus packaging and documentation took a full 3 month focus
ibicus designed not to download dataset but to make it easy to apply/compare; their engagement also shows there is demand for the BA datasets
happy if you use it (open license) and happy to open up to R users
there's many components to the evaluation framework that you have to manually walk through as a user
in convos with UKCH, conferences, Met Office users primarily; coding & climate science abilities high
"status quo" question: people are used to using their org's method
depends on level of operational constraints
interest in developing a scorecard in the long term (point user to evaluations that may be important to them)
health researchers and public agencies have high demand but its misunderstood how much work is needed before it can be integrated or applied with health models
climate variables of particular interest are heat and humidity (and rainfall)
clim-recal apply ibicus to expand the BC methods clim-recal currently applies via python
are methods all inheriting from the debiaser class? yes
RB: start with methods in ibicus as starting point and stretch goal is to use the methods again in R to compare (reticulate); wrapper would be preferrable as ibicus does not plan to implement in R
FS: more than happy for you to use the methods, and give feedback if things aren't working correctly
FS: also happy to bring your other methods into debiaser class
can clim-recal incorporate ibicus visualisations into our assessment process
FS: happy to for you to integrate
are ibicus team members open to helping with assessment review/decisions
not much time for ibicus software maintenance
web app visualisation
interactive more focused on population side, but as part of that we need to visualise the predictions anyway
scorecard and front end app don't need to be together but they have the same goal of making the outputs more accessible
ways of working:
3 month software sprints; uncertainty quantification and cross validation (starting in march)