Open rosselton opened 2 years ago
This is addressed in PR #499 The link is meant to function as a internal relative link, and in a longer page would jump the user down to a lower section of the page without scrolling, but the page content is so short that it seems as if the link goes no-where and is broken. Since user feedback highlights this as confusing behaviour, the relative link has been removed from the source text.
@ChristinaLast ChristinaLast 2 days ago Why are we removing these local links? Are they broken?
Author @rosselton rosselton 2 days ago The link is meant to function as a internal relative link, and in a longer page would jump the user down to a lower section of the page without scrolling, but the page content is so short that it seems as if the link goes no-where and is broken. Since user feedback highlights this as confusing behaviour, the relative link has been removed from the source text.
Author @rosselton rosselton 2 days ago It confused me as well at first when I first saw it, I though it was a broken link. Maybe there used to be more text on the page and then it got made shorter at some point. It seems redundant now anyway.
Author @rosselton rosselton 2 days ago This changes appear to be causing the test_classify_guidance to fail.
Summary
At the start of the classification process Question 1 asks: 'Will the research generate (including by selecting, or sorting or combining) any personal data' The personal data is a broken link
(http://localhost:8000/projects/1/work_packages/1/classify/11#personal_data)
What needs to be done?
Fix the link or provide the information by a different method on the page. The text may need rewriting.
Which user story does this task relate to?
440