Closed jemrobinson closed 3 months ago
I think that would be fine. If you're happy with these changes otherwise, maybe the easiest solution is to merge this as-is, merge release-v5.0.0 into your branch for #2129 and then make the blob name optional there. What do you think?
Or actually, separate this function into a blob_service_client
and blob_client
function. I can do that here if you'd prefer?
@craddm : Does f14ae787e fix your issue?
@craddm : Does https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/data-safe-haven/commit/f14ae787e75ed81aa4218ef857899b2c18f4d67c fix your issue?
Tested this with some edits to #2129 and it works!
Great - are we OK to merge this one then?
LGTM
:white_check_mark: Checklist
Enable foobar integration
rather than515 foobar
).develop
.:vertical_traffic_light: Depends on
n/a
:arrow_heading_up: Summary
blob_client()
method is used everywhere we need aBlobServiceClient
blob_client()
are caught and (if appropriate) reraised by the calling function:closed_umbrella: Related issues
n/a
:microscope: Tests
Tested on an existing SRE