Open helendduncan opened 7 months ago
Based on the last meeting discussion, I think we came down fairly heavily in favour of JOSS and I'm happy with that personally. @catavallejos and I can write the motivating stuff for the short paper component, and we can probably pull together the existing Quarto based examples, so I don't think initial submission would be too much work. It would be more following through the review process, which naturally would fall substantially on @helendduncan and @yongrenjie
Yes, happy to go for JOSS and the plan suggested by @louisaslett above
Just adding update note from meeting today that the plan is for @catavallejos and @louisaslett to start writing the short JOSS paper in early June. At that time @crangelsmith will send a poll for meeting in 2nd half of June to discuss it and prep submission.
Agreement that @catavallejos and @louisaslett handle peer review responses around the written paper and @crangelsmith coordinates peer review responses around code.
This issue is to discuss potential publishing options for the repo/project and will fall under the PIs discretion.
From previous meetings things which were discussed Dissemination outside of CRAN. F1000? JOSS? (will need to be public before publishing)