Open f-rower opened 1 month ago
Feedback from @slynn:
Possible use cases, following from meetings with Partnerships and PM team
Necessary fields:
re: developing taxonomy, I have given @dingaaling and @f-rower access to the sharepoint list which build the map, so you can see the fields we developed for E&S (with the RCM team and @kallewesterling @aranas :) ). Fields also below. I think the only thing not covered from the above is project outputs.
I'm currently mapping these onto the fields available in Dynamics CRM to manage mailings, and I think project outputs is in there. The data in Dynamics is not well populated centrally, but we need to keep an eye on duplication of efforts - If we're collecting data about outputs etc, it should probably be going into Dynamics...
@cassgvp is Dynamics CRM the CRM system used by the Turing?
@cassgvp did you use a different system/kind of fields for organisations?
@dingaaling We made our own fields in a custom sharepoint list. We weren't getting much traction with our request for support/access to Dynamics when we started, and it wasn't clear that it was necessary, but now I'm increasingly leaning back towards it...
Initial feedback on v1
UA REG:
Partnerships:
Summary
What needs to be done?
Updates