The following BibTeX entry, from Wikipedia, is valid:
@Book{abramowitz+stegun,
author = "Milton {Abramowitz} and Irene A. {Stegun}",
title = "Handbook of Mathematical Functions with
Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables",
publisher = "Dover",
year = 1964,
address = "New York City",
edition = "ninth Dover printing, tenth GPO printing"
}
Note that values for BibTeX fields can be in more than one line. This is supported by bibtexparser and \n is included to represent the line break. If you have
citations = {foo,
bar}
the Python script will look for BibTeX IDs foo and \nbar. It will find the first but not the second. This pull request fix this issue by removing n so that the Python script searchers for foo and bar as BibTeX IDs.
The following BibTeX entry, from Wikipedia, is valid:
Note that values for BibTeX fields can be in more than one line. This is supported by bibtexparser and
\n
is included to represent the line break. If you havethe Python script will look for BibTeX IDs
foo
and\nbar
. It will find the first but not the second. This pull request fix this issue by removingn
so that the Python script searchers forfoo
andbar
as BibTeX IDs.