Closed Christinele14 closed 2 years ago
If you only could show me the steps, in detail, that you did...
But I suspect you didn't cap your chains with N and C terminals while using tleap
.
Yeap. Here is my tleap.in file. Yes, I guess I have to add the chain information inside tleap. Could you please take a look and suggest how could I add chain information inside so that two chains could be identified? Thank you in advance.
`source oldff/leaprc.ff99SB source leaprc.gaff2 source leaprc.water.tip3p
loadamberprep 1a0q_ligand_h_cleaned.prepi loadamberparams 1a0q_ligand_h_cleaned.frcmod mol = loadpdb cat_1a0q_complex.pdb
solvatebox mol TIP3PBOX 8 addions mol Cl- 0 saveamberparm mol 1a0q_complex.prmtop 1a0q_complex.inpcrd quit `
Have a look here https://github.com/alanwilter/acpype/wiki/Tutorial-NAMD
But your protein has problems. Have you seen its 3D? https://www.rcsb.org/3d-view/1A0Q
Have you read the PDB header?
REMARK 465 MISSING RESIDUES
REMARK 465 THE FOLLOWING RESIDUES WERE NOT LOCATED IN THE
REMARK 465 EXPERIMENT. (M=MODEL NUMBER; RES=RESIDUE NAME; C=CHAIN
REMARK 465 IDENTIFIER; SSSEQ=SEQUENCE NUMBER; I=INSERTION CODE.)
REMARK 465
REMARK 465 M RES C SSSEQI
REMARK 465 ASP L 1
REMARK 465 GLU H 1
REMARK 465 GLY H 98
REMARK 465 ARG H 99
REMARK 465 SER H 100
REMARK 465 ASN H 100A
REMARK 465 GLY H 127
REMARK 465 SER H 128
REMARK 465 ALA H 129
REMARK 465 ALA H 130
REMARK 465 GLN H 131
REMARK 465 THR H 132
REMARK 465 ASN H 133
tleap
already does the terminals accordingly, but there are several things to pay attention. You likely need to learn tleap
properly. But first you really need to know your protein and your input PDB.
I really doubt we have a ACPYPE
issue here.
I successfully prepared the amber topology for the complex 1A0Q (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/1A0Q). However, when I used acpype to generate the Gromacs topology, it seemed that two chains in my protein are merged into one. It seemed weird. So could you please take a look at it? Thank you.