Closed taransamarth closed 1 year ago
In Nevada, districts must (per judicial order for the 2010 cycle):
Data for Nevada comes from the ALARM Project's 2010 Redistricting Data Files.
No manual pre-processing decisions were necessary.
We sample 5,000 districting plans for Nevada across 2 independent runs of the sequential Markov Chain algorithm. No special techniques were needed to produce the sample.
SMC: 10,000 sampled plans of 4 districts on 2,126 units `adapt_k_thresh`=0.985 • `seq_alpha`=0.5 `est_label_mult`=1 • `pop_temper`=0 Plan diversity 80% range: 0.40 to 0.71 R-hat values for summary statistics: pop_overlap total_vap plan_dev comp_edge comp_polsby pop_white pop_black 1.0002063 1.0002810 1.0006149 0.9999139 0.9999444 1.0001142 1.0012686 pop_hisp pop_aian pop_asian pop_nhpi pop_other pop_two vap_white 1.0001121 1.0014044 1.0004709 1.0020534 1.0002993 0.9999197 1.0001148 vap_black vap_hisp vap_aian vap_asian vap_nhpi vap_other vap_two 1.0011788 1.0000836 1.0012117 1.0005095 1.0003058 1.0003143 0.9999955 pre_16_dem_cli pre_16_rep_tru pre_20_dem_bid pre_20_rep_tru uss_16_dem_cor uss_16_rep_hec uss_18_dem_ros 1.0007432 1.0000296 1.0010173 0.9999957 1.0007206 1.0000501 1.0011719 uss_18_rep_hel gov_18_dem_sis gov_18_rep_lax atg_18_dem_for atg_18_rep_dun sos_18_dem_ara sos_18_rep_ceg 0.9999978 1.0011318 1.0000111 1.0013835 0.9999975 1.0014605 1.0000070 adv_16 adv_18 adv_20 arv_16 arv_18 arv_20 county_splits 1.0007363 1.0013704 1.0010173 1.0000381 0.9999974 0.9999957 0.9999254 muni_splits ndv nrv ndshare e_dvs pr_dem e_dem 1.0003447 1.0012976 0.9999940 1.0004781 1.0004698 1.0011042 1.0009030 pbias egap 1.0004456 1.0014816 Sampling diagnostics for SMC run 1 of 2 (5,000 samples) Eff. samples (%) Acc. rate Log wgt. sd Max. unique Est. k Split 1 4,248 (85.0%) 12.6% 0.83 3,178 (101%) 7 Split 2 4,615 (92.3%) 13.5% 0.47 3,057 ( 97%) 5 Split 3 4,665 (93.3%) 7.3% 0.48 2,892 ( 92%) 3 Resample 3,681 (73.6%) NA% 0.48 2,941 ( 93%) NA Sampling diagnostics for SMC run 2 of 2 (5,000 samples) Eff. samples (%) Acc. rate Log wgt. sd Max. unique Est. k Split 1 4,256 (85.1%) 10.7% 0.82 3,143 ( 99%) 8 Split 2 4,617 (92.3%) 13.4% 0.47 3,037 ( 96%) 5 Split 3 4,672 (93.4%) 7.3% 0.48 2,902 ( 92%) 3 Resample 3,696 (73.9%) NA% 0.48 2,916 ( 92%) NA
TODO
enforce_style()
redist_map
redist_plans
@christopherkenny (sorry if you weren't the one who volunteered, I couldn't actually tell who was speaking, haha)
Looks good, thanks Taran!
2010 Nevada Congressional Districts
Redistricting requirements
In Nevada, districts must (per judicial order for the 2010 cycle):
Algorithmic Constraints
Data Sources
Data for Nevada comes from the ALARM Project's 2010 Redistricting Data Files.
Pre-processing Notes
No manual pre-processing decisions were necessary.
Simulation Notes
We sample 5,000 districting plans for Nevada across 2 independent runs of the sequential Markov Chain algorithm. No special techniques were needed to produce the sample.
Validation
Checklist
TODO
lines from the template code have been removedenforce_style()
to format my coderedist_map
andredist_plans
objects, and summary statistics) have been edited@christopherkenny (sorry if you weren't the one who volunteered, I couldn't actually tell who was speaking, haha)