be geographically compact, as defined by two compactness measures:
length-width compactness, which measures the total absolute difference between the length and width of a district, across all districts
perimeter compactness, which measures the total perimeter of all districts
Interpretation of requirements
We enforce a maximum population deviation of 0.01%, given strict historical deviation standards.
We also merge VTDs into counties and run the simulation at the county level.
For compactness, we increase the compactness parameter to 1.1, which does not create too much inefficiency.
Redistricting requirements
In Iowa, districts must:
Interpretation of requirements
We enforce a maximum population deviation of 0.01%, given strict historical deviation standards. We also merge VTDs into counties and run the simulation at the county level. For compactness, we increase the
compactness
parameter to 1.1, which does not create too much inefficiency.Data Sources
Data for Iowa comes from the ALARM Project's 2020 Redistricting Data Files.
Pre-processing Notes
No manual pre-processing decisions were necessary.
Simulation Notes
We sample 5,000 districting plans for Iowa across two independent runs of the SMC algorithm. As noted above, we set
compactness=1.1
.Validation
Note: VI spike at 0 because of a low total number of configurations with this low tolerance.
Checklist
TODO
lines from the template code have been removedenforce_style()
to format my coderedist_map
andredist_plans
objects, and summary statistics) have been edited@christopherkenny