Open alashworth opened 5 years ago
Issue by bgoodri Saturday Mar 07, 2015 at 18:38 GMT Originally opened as https://github.com/stan-dev/stan/issues/1348
Currently, when you do chains in parallel the progress report does not look so good
Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup) Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup) Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup) Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup) Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup) Iteration: 500 / 2000 [ 25%] (Warmup) Iteration: 500 / 2000 [ 25%] (Warmup) Iteration: 500 / 2000 [ 25%] (Warmup) Iteration: 500 / 2000 [ 25%] (Warmup) Iteration: 500 / 2000 [ 25%] (Warmup) Iteration: 500 / 2000 [ 25%] (Warmup)
And it is even worse if the chains are not progressing at the same rate. It would be better if it said
Chain #, iteration: ...
but print_progress() currently does not have an argument to accept the chain ID.
Comment by syclik Sunday Mar 15, 2015 at 04:04 GMT
@bgoodri, there's already a prefix argument for that purpose. I'm not sure if it's sufficient, but I'll try to create a pull request for RStan that'll fix it.
prefix
Comment by bob-carpenter Thursday Nov 24, 2016 at 05:52 GMT
see #1166
Issue by bgoodri Saturday Mar 07, 2015 at 18:38 GMT Originally opened as https://github.com/stan-dev/stan/issues/1348
Currently, when you do chains in parallel the progress report does not look so good
And it is even worse if the chains are not progressing at the same rate. It would be better if it said
but print_progress() currently does not have an argument to accept the chain ID.