Closed beatriz-ferreira closed 5 years ago
Hi Beatriz,
how about adding a concatenation layer in the end? Sorry, it's a bit inconvenient. We will keep it in mind for the major, upcoming update.
Cheers, Max
Hi Max,
Thank you for your reply. I'll try that! Adding a concatenation layer shouldn't change any behaviour of the interpretation, is that correct?
Yes, it would be great if the major upcoming update considered this issue!!
Best, Beatriz
No, mind that most/all analysis methods work w.r.t. to one output neuron. Thus it only changes the way you index them.
We will!
Cheers
@albermax Has this been worked on ?
Hi,
I was trying to run innvestigate for a custom model that has more than one output (kind of a multi-task model). I am also getting the following error (already mentioned in): line 370-371 of
analyzer/base.py
So I guess I have to split it into two different models
Originally posted by @jurgyy in https://github.com/albermax/innvestigate/issues/137#issuecomment-470149510
Is there any way of analyzing such a model with more than one output? I'm really interested in keeping the two outputs, i.e. a joint model, as the two outputs predict different level classifications (categories and attributes) of the same image. Since these two outputs are related I would like to study them together. Is there any way of applying innvestigate for such a case?
Thank you!