Closed ManuelSchneid3r closed 6 months ago
If nobody complains, these plugins go with MIT then:
That would be illegal to do. You have to remove them if you don't get explicit approval from everyone who worked on that plugin.
I give you approval to use and provide the one change I made under whatever license is convenient for the project. The fix was a convenience for me and I am personally okay with deferring to the license of the upstream software for my contributions.
I do agree with the above commenter that you should get explicit approval from the tagged folks who have made substantial contributions, or otherwise figure out licensing with them on equal terms rather than just imposing it upon them.
That would be illegal to do. You have to remove them if you don't get explicit approval from everyone who worked on that plugin.
Thats probably correct. If it even were only these. We have a history of unlicensed contributions. Shipping Albert was illegal ever since. It's a ton of work. Any ideas?
I also approve any license you want on my minuscule contribution.
I approve any license change for my one-line change 😀
I'm happy for my change to be used under any non-proprietary licence. I don't even remember what it was 😄
I approve any license change, even tho I cannot remember to be a contributor 😄
I am the original author of my 5 character change to the jetbrains python plugin and approve any licensing changes that will suit the desires of this project.
Okay this is probably not going to work out and is not that straight forward I opened #1349 which tries to target the commits that are actually to be shipped. Sorry for the noise and thank you for your attention .
Most of the contributions I actually sent PRs for was rewriting/fixing the yt and window switcher plugins, both now archived. Not sure what the plan is with archived plugins (since they're not on the new list) but if they get revived then I'm fine with whatever.
...unless there's some secret masterplan where those will suddenly start making millions next week :wink:
...unless there's some secret masterplan where those will suddenly start making millions next week 😉
The plan is to get them shipped for free without being sued. So... probably not 😅
Not sure what the plan is with archived plugins…
There has never been a plan. Plugins need maintainers. I cant maintain all of them.
I approve! thank you for your work!
I approve any license you want for my contributions.
Thank you for your effort maintaining albert!
I approve any license (as long as it's not a proprietary one) you want for my contributions.
Jan 14, 2024 8:21:30 PM Florian Adamsky - notifications at github.com @.***>:
Forwarded by SimpleLogin to @.** from "Florian Adamsky " with Re: [albertlauncher/albert] Licensing of the python plugins (Issue #1348)* as subject
I approve any license you want for my contributions.
Thank you for your effort maintaining albert!
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[https://github.com/albertlauncher/albert/issues/1348#issuecomment-1890937061], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMBSVDTT3M2UYP5XTCKLP2TYOPETTAVCNFSM6AAAAABBYQUI32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOJQHEZTOMBWGE]. You are receiving this because you were mentioned. [Tracking image][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AMBSVDSEZBRIIEW5VR5RWQLYOPETTA5CNFSM6AAAAABBYQUI32WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTTQWVUOK.gif]
Same here. I approve any license you want for my contributions, as it's not a proprietary one.
Completely fine with any license that suits the project. Keep up the good work, contributors.
I'm fine with the licence that the project works with.
I approve, you can use whatever license works best for the project! Thanks.
I also approve any license you want for my contribution :smile:
I also approve any license change
I also approve
I also approve of any license change you choose to go with. Great work on the project!
I approve the license change.
I also approve any license change
Feel free to relicense any of the commits I've made to the Albert launcher plugins as well
I didn't contribute much but feel free to use any license you want for it. Edit: It's literally 18 characters on one line. LOL
I approve; feel free to use whatever license works best.
I approve of the relicensing of my contributions made at https://github.com/albertlauncher/python/commit/bafa42a9670bddda49585348f35121e4ae54a58c and https://github.com/albertlauncher/python/commit/2c96e73205878132f8e6616042b905a6bd3d68cf to the MIT license.
EDIT: This approach is legally not solid. Therefore see #1349 where its about getting explicit agreements for the shipped plugins. However a general agreement is still useful for the case when we resurrect plugins from the archive.
Dear contributors @benedictdudel @dshoreman @tyilo @tomsquest @BarrensZeppelin @DenverCoder1 @iyzana @googol42 @mqus @devhammed @netsgnut @djmbritt @Bierchermuesli @proItheus @cyprienruffino @Keating950 @mparati31 @nerf @cit @shenxn @dsager @bergercookie @sinnytk @z4yx @tim3z @edjoperez @greizgh @matthewbogner @fionera @g-walsh @nikhilw @Pete-Hamlin @faheel @ismasou @poettig @tendstofortytwo @okaestne @vmaerten @DavidDeadly @ovitor @gaganpreet @er-azh @stevenxxiu @maxmil
Albert has several modules, contibutions and unfortunately a messy licensing state. There are several problems:
We need to relicense or get rid of any copyright only (unlicensed) and copyleft code, otherwise shipping Albert is not legal.
Thats why I want to ask you all without having to address each case, wheter your code was not licensed, relicensed, or copyleft licensed: are you fine with your code being relicensed to MIT?
Agreements: