Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
There might be some problems with durable subscriptions in AMQCPP itself. I'm
looking
into this.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 6 Jun 2007 at 12:15
There are problems with Session::unsubscribe. Reported as AMQCPP-132.
Meanwhile, src/examples/DurableSubscriberExample.py is a good starting point for
testing durable subscription.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 16 Jun 2007 at 12:19
sorry, i just try DurableSubscriberExample.py example and i consider it doesn's
work
properly:
---the first problem is the following string:
"if isinstance(message, pyactivemq.TextMessage):"
This check always returns true and that's why the following error occurs:
"Fatal Python error: Invalid Message type encountered in MessageListener"
---then, it seems to me, that "self.session.unsubscribe("MakeItLast")" doesn't
work
correctly. I have changed the previous "IF" check and then I recieved the
following
error:
self.session.unsubscribe("MakeItLast")
UserWarning: response from futureResponse was invalid
Do you know how to correct these errors?
I use pyactivemq 0.0.3pre1 Win32 release (based on ActiveMQ C++ 2.1-SNAPSHOT
trunk
revision 547225
Original comment by de.Remed...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2008 at 10:57
Hello,
Looks like you might have run into a bug in the version of AMQCPP I used to
build
pyactivemq 0.0.3pre1.
I'll try to make a new build of pyactivemq next week, or you could build it on
your
own (admittedly a very hard process, since you'll probably need to hack on the
AMQCPP
build).
Cheers,
Albert
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 7 May 2008 at 11:21
thank you, i'll wait for a new build, as my attempt was failed...(
Original comment by de.Remed...@gmail.com
on 8 May 2008 at 4:31
Ok, I'm looking at this issue today. Stay tuned.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 25 May 2008 at 9:34
There are some problems with building the latest AMQCPP using Visual Studio
.NET 2003:
http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-comile-C%2B%2B-client-on-VC%2B%2B-2003-td1468047
9s2354.html
The problem is related to covariant return types. AFAIK, VS2003 is supposed to
support this, but maybe AMQCPP is just a bit too complex. I can't see anything
obviously wrong with the AMQCPP code.
I'm going to try to get a decent workaround for the problem. If this doesn't
work,
I'll just hack the source as described in the thread above.
This situation should improve in September with the release of Python 2.6,
which uses
Visual Studio 2008 as its compiler.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 25 May 2008 at 10:27
The idea I get from some comments on this page:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/ismart.aspx
is that VS2003 doesn't support virtual base classes as covariant return types.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 25 May 2008 at 10:45
Further indications of problems with covariant return types of virtual
functions when
virtual base classes are involved can be found here:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=23760&SiteID=1
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 25 May 2008 at 10:48
I've created an issue in the AMQCPP JIRA to see if they can help me come up
with a
graceful workaround.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-176
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 25 May 2008 at 11:01
In the mean time, please test the following file:
http://pyactivemq.googlecode.com/files/pyactivemq-snapshot.win32-py2.5.zip
Extract pyactivemq.pyd and drop it in your C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages
directory.
You might need to install the VC++ 2005 runtime DLLs for this to work:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=32bc1bee-a3f9-4c13-9c99
-220b62a191ee&displaylang=en
Using this build of pyactivemq, all the tests and examples in SVN trunk seem to
work.
I used Visual Studio 2005 to build this version.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 26 May 2008 at 12:06
I used version 5.1.0 of the ActiveMQ broker when running the tests and examples.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 26 May 2008 at 12:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fullung@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2007 at 10:59