Closed abhibeckert closed 2 years ago
The current name seems the most logical to me. "Country codes" is much broader and includes at least 2 other standards, ISO 3166-1 is a common enough standard that it is commonly searched for by developers who need to implement it (this is also how I found it, and probably wouldn't have found it otherwise). If a developer has a personal issue with typing those few letters and numbers, I don't see any disadvantage to the solution of using a use
statement that you outlined.
Is there a reason this project is named
iso3166
?Surely
CountryCodes
(or something more inventive) would make this a lot more usable. I personally rename it in all myuse
statements, but I'd rather not do that.