Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2012 at 5:59
Why wasn't this fixed in the last release? Was it problematic? Seems
like there will never be a complete solution for CEF 1 memory problems,
as Chromium was never intented for single process architecture?
Original comment by czarek.t...@gmail.com
on 17 May 2013 at 6:26
@comment#2: May be you interested in this issue
https://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/issues/detail?id=960 . It is also
applied to CEF1.
Original comment by fdd...@gmail.com
on 17 May 2013 at 8:29
@comment#2: I spent some time testing various iteration counts for
v8::V8::IdleNotification(). In my testing I was unable to identify a
useful/consistent balance between performance (IdleNotification takes time to
run) and memory reduction. Unless we can provide good guidance on usage I think
there's a high probability of this function being used incorrectly.
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 17 May 2013 at 8:39
CEF1 has entered bug-fix-only maintenance mode. See
http://magpcss.org/ceforum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=10647 for details. If this
issue applies to the current version of CEF3 please create a new issue.
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 11 Oct 2013 at 2:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
avivr...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2012 at 11:29Attachments: