Closed MaxwellFang closed 5 years ago
Thank you for pointing this out. The derivation had some typos. Please see the updated readme for a more explicit and cleaner version:
Thank you for the explanation. Just one more question, why the last line contains an absolute value? Even in later discussion, U^T A U doesn't seem taking the absolute value either. Is that also a typo? Thank you
It's not an absolute value it's the determinant.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019, 11:52 PM MaxwellFang notifications@github.com wrote:
Thank you for the explanation. Just one more question, why the last line contains an absolute value? Even in later discussion, U^T A U doesn't seem taken the absolute value either. Is that also a typo? Thank you
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/alecjacobson/geometry-processing-parameterization/issues/51#issuecomment-485633731, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARDJGPKBTXZ4CKT4UIUQK3PR2BZLANCNFSM4HHMLP7A .
Thanks for the explanation, I am going to close this issue
I am not sure how to derive from the second line to the third line, the best derivation I got is sum_{i, j} ui ortho(uj - ui). Also, if the third line is correct since the two vectors multiplied are orthogonal to each other, which leads the result to 0.