Closed sgsellan closed 2 years ago
Previously, the ordering convention in the tetrahedral output of this function when choosing the "rotationally symmetric scheme" was inconsistent with the convention used in the rest of this library or even by this function with other schemes.
See, for example:
>> [V,T] = regular_tetrahedral_mesh(2,2,2,'Method','rotationally-symmetric');volume(V,T) ans = -0.1667 -0.1667 -0.1667 -0.1667 -0.1667 -0.1667
whereas using another tet division scheme
>> [V,T] = regular_tetrahedral_mesh(2,2,2,'Method','reflectionally-symmetric');volume(V,T) ans = 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
After the small change in this PR all the indexing is consistent
>> [V,T] = regular_tetrahedral_mesh(2,2,2,'Method','rotationally-symmetric');volume(V,T) ans = 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
Previously, the ordering convention in the tetrahedral output of this function when choosing the "rotationally symmetric scheme" was inconsistent with the convention used in the rest of this library or even by this function with other schemes.
See, for example:
whereas using another tet division scheme
After the small change in this PR all the indexing is consistent