Closed 0xfede7c8 closed 4 years ago
Applied changes of review. Still missing the tests.
@alecxe I fixed the README. Feel free to clone the fork and push to this branch whatever changes to the readme you want.
This is looking awesome so far @0xfede7c8!
Should I change anything to the tests? I thought I did but as we are mantaining compatibility it should work right? BTW, how should I run the tests to try?
@0xfede7c8 yeah, it's important to see that the existing tests pass as is.
Apologies as we don't really have test/dev environment setup instructions for contributors here.
You should be able to just call pytest
after installing dev requirements with pip install -r dev-requirements.txt
. pytest would use pytest.ini options and auto-discover tests automatically. Lmk if it works.
Tests passing. Fixed some stuff that is discovered while testing (i.e: naming collision with Faker and python2 compatibility).
Merging #28 into master will increase coverage by
2.34%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #28 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.65% 98.00% +2.34%
==========================================
Files 1 2 +1
Lines 46 100 +54
==========================================
+ Hits 44 98 +54
Misses 2 2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
scrapy_fake_useragent/middleware.py | 96.72% <100.00%> (+1.06%) |
:arrow_up: |
scrapy_fake_useragent/providers.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3e5ed91...d5d7688. Read the comment docs.
Ok, it seems that I need to make some tests to cover the new providers.
The tests on travis fail (https://travis-ci.org/github/alecxe/scrapy-fake-useragent), but they pass locally. I suspect the mock for fake-useragent does not work there for some reason and, hence, fake-useragent fails to get the user-agents. I'll keep trying to make it work but lmk if you have ideas what is going on. Thanks.
fake-useragent can make use of a cache in /tmp/something. I can be that? Try deleting that and running locally again.
fake-useragent can make use of a cache in /tmp/something. I can be that? Try deleting that and running locally again.
Bingo. Yes, it was an incorrect mock that was then cached and reused :) Thanks!
All tests passed. Does it all look good to you and would work for your use case? Once I get a thumbs up from you, I'll go ahead and merge and upload to PyPI - lmk.
Thanks a lot for doing this!
It's good for my use case! My pleasure, thanks for the help!
Still a few details missing, like fixing the tests, and actually smoke test it.
@alecxe you can check how it is looking
Feel free to ask anything and suggest any changes.