Open christiaanwesterbeek opened 7 years ago
+1
+1
I created a fork and merged in a couple of PRs that were important for our project (and added some minor tweaks that we needed): https://github.com/dpoetzsch/mdPickers. As long as no one answers here, I'd be happy to accept your PRs there. If at some point the original repository is revived we could just pull it all in with one big PR.
@dpoetzsch Thanks. I'll use your fork next time.
So I found the time to bring my fork to an acceptable state and release a version 1.0.0 on bower (all changes are listed in the link).
I had to choose a new name on bower: md-pickers
. See README for installation.
For now this might be an interesting option if you want an actively developed version of mdPickers
. I still have quite a couple of ideas for improving and stabilizing the pickers.
Anyhow, I'm open to merge my changes with this repo if it gets revived.
Thanks, @dpoetzsch , I've switched to your fork now
There's another version based on mdPickers at https://github.com/classlinkinc/angular-material-time-picker
accessibility is busted AF on https://github.com/classlinkinc/angular-material-time-picker which makes me think it's just styled the same
My version based on mdPickers at https://github.com/mpicciolli/angular-material-picker
@mpicciolli Any interest in merging our efforts? I too support 24h time format and flexible labels for the dialog. Furthermore, I recently integrated some great pull requests by contributors that make the picker even more configurable and stable. I saw that you also tweaked the CSS a little and fixed some bugs.
Is there a Angular 2 version for this awesome picker?
@jsitu There is a discussion in my fork for that: https://github.com/dpoetzsch/md-pickers/issues/19 At the moment I don't know of a port to Angular 2/4, however, I'm interested to give it a try.
@alenaksu @jolafrite @rjnichols Do you still monitor this repo? There are some fine PR's that help make this component better. Maybe I missed an issue or comment that explains the status of this repo.
BTW: "No", is an acceptable answer too. Then we know and can act to transfer ownership to somebody else.