Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Issue 274 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by dmel...@gmail.com
on 2 Aug 2010 at 7:41
The latest IDE changelog indicated that there now was a recipy for .S files
(assembly), but in no way I am able to add assembly files to be picked up by
the build process.
Is this issue the reason to that nothing happens?
Or else I don't get the point of adding a recipy for assembly when it still
isn't possible to let the build system compile them.
Original comment by lars.wad...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2014 at 1:40
From my personal point of view, Issue 274 was not to be fused with Issue 314.
Issue 314 speaks about "ability to include libraries per-sketch".
Issue 274 speaks about "support .S (assembly files)".
When I starred this issue, I was looking for the possibility to include
personalized libraries per-sketch. For example, if I need to add a personalized
version of "stepper" library to ONE of my sketches, I would like to add it in
the same folder (or subfolder) of the sketch.
Why? --> 1) Because the sketch itself should be portable.
--> 2) Because if I lose the folder of the IDE...........
I hope in a solution for this issue, or in some advices, in case I did not
understand something.
Original comment by doppio...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2014 at 5:31
[deleted comment]
Yes, I know. I saw Issue 314 at first but then I was thinking that since the
changelog indicated assembly recipy was added, why then doesn't it work to have
assembly files in the project?
One reason I could think of is that maybe it is related to this issue, that it
doesn't accept libraries per-sketch yet, that's why I posted in this issue.
I don't know, there is not much light on this issue about assembly files.
I want it badly, but I don't want to hack the IDE or the build tools. My
project should work out of the box without people having to rebuild the arduino
ide.
Can't believe that such an obvious feature like assembly is missing, especially
since the gnu tool chain builds this without much extra work.
Original comment by lars.wad...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2014 at 9:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dmel...@gmail.com
on 2 Aug 2010 at 7:40