Closed odahcam closed 6 years ago
Sorry, I didn't find time for this, for the moment I do not have time for it, but I plan to come back to continue. Off course I accept contributions.
I consider the project still in the incipient phase as there are a lot of bar code types to migrate and each require a sustained effort and considerable time.
vin., 2 feb. 2018, 13:18 Luiz Machado notifications@github.com a scris:
You can open the repo for mantainers.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/aleris/zxing-typescript/issues/12, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA9uLV3nSExrGCggtSldu8Jnh0IQ43tBks5tQu8hgaJpZM4R3Cd_ .
If you want, I can be a caollaborator/mantainer and push directly to a develop
branch here instead of mantaining my own branch.
also got some cross-browser issues, anyway I can help with this?
@odahcam Sure let's give it a go. Please see in Projects for the plan I had in mind. I already started working on pdf417 so you might want to skip that. Please also see typescriptport.md for the rules I used, if you feel like changing something please let me know. Because of intensive use of bit manipulation some are tricky to port, the file above contain some info. Please let me know if I can help with something going forward. The main work to go forward is to implement new code bars as listed in the project plan. Off course, we can consult If you feel like changing something.
@noru I think the best would be to make a PR?
All right @aleris , what I've done until now:
That's what I can remember, when I make any update I'll documentate exactly what it is.
Thanks.
@odahcam Sound good.
Please keep in mind that any deviation from original zxing java code base would make future updates difficult, so any change like test renaming should be done only if necessary (eg, test renamed).
The test problems sound strange, I didn't have any problem like that, it worked for me 100% of a time (except proper fails off course). Did you change something in the workflow, added something to the build process, etc? If yes, you may want to reconsider it.
Well, in that case I think I should make a compare to this master branch to see exactly what was changed. But in short I can say that I didn't changed anything too much, I'm a little newbie at TypeScript, so I tryied not to do complex things.
For now I can say that I've made changes to build so the package could fit TypeScript and NPM deployment recomendations and rules.
The best approach would be to make small incremental changes and push to main in steps if everything looks good.
În sâm., 3 feb. 2018 la 19:09, Luiz Machado notifications@github.com a scris:
Well, in that case I think I should make a compare to this master branch to see exactly what was changed. But in short I can say that I didn't changed anything too much, I'm a little newbie at TypeScript, so I tryied not to do complex things.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/aleris/zxing-typescript/issues/12#issuecomment-362835196, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA9uLaK5US2Wl53a3PFdfPSa2y12a0aEks5tRJLVgaJpZM4R3Cd_ .
My main problem is that I need some changes ASAP, so I will keep improving my fork, then I will start to bring things by small merges to here again.
Also, I have my tests performance issue, that I'd like to discuss: https://github.com/odahcam/zxing-ts/issues/5
You can open the repo for mantainers.