Open xsrvmy opened 3 years ago
This sounds like a need we could probably accommodate.
Can you whip up a MWE in LaTeX showing an example formula that illustrates the problem in CM vs. Libertinus Math? Not using much math typesetting personally that would make it a lot easier for me to either work on or even review if somebody else is able to contribute this.
Using unicode-math, here is the output of
$v \nu \symup{v} \symup{\nu} \symbfsf{v} \symbfsf{\nu} \symbfsfit{v} \symbfsfit{\nu}$
on LM (default unicode-math font), STIX2, Pagella, Termes and Libertinus.
The first three examples use a curved v and a sharp nu. Termes uses a round hook on the nu. Libertinus shows no distinguishing features without looking very closely.
I think the best option may actually be rounding out the left hook of the nu like STIX 2 and Termes, or extending it like how one would handwrite the nu character. Changing v would probably require changing w as well, and runs the risk of confusing v and upsilon like CM/LM.
Using CM fonts, it is easy to distinguish
v
and\nu
. Unfortunately, with libertinus math, the letters are extremely similar, and it is only possible to tell them apart by comparing them side to side.Is it possible to introduce a style set that would use a curved v like CM does? Or changing nu to a rounded hook on the left