Open wehro opened 3 years ago
There may be some relevant discussion in #338. By the way, what exactly do you mean by "inadequate glyph", @wehro? What would be the adequate glyph?
Also, for reference, "double macron" here refers to a double-length macron over two characters, not one stacked over another, which IIUC is the subject of #67, #118/#126, and #286.
I don’t see any direct relationship to #338.
What would be the adequate glyph?
I don’t know the name of this glyph nor its correct codepoint. But it’s certainly not a macron. For Libertinus Sans (Regular and Italic) I get the following output for ‘au’ with combined double macron:
It should be obvious that the italic output is not correct.
The combining double macron is represented by an inadequate glyph in the following fonts:
The combining double macron is missing in:
The combining double macron is a spacing character instead of a combining accent in: