Here is the relevant entry from my Biber (.bib) file.
@article{Auffeves_Grangier_2015,
title = {Classical selection and quantum {D}arwinism},
volume = {68},
issn = {1945-0699},
doi = {10.1063/pt.3.2759},
number = {5},
journal = {{Physics Today}},
publisher = {{AIP Publishing}},
author = {Auffèves, Alexia and Grangier, Philippe},
date = {2015-05-01},
pages = {8-8},
}
This renders as such using the default biblatex-bath settings:
The empty brackets after the volume and issue number are not desirable. I believe they are for the issue field, but I am (correctly, as I understand) using the numerical number field instead.
Is this a bug in biblatex-bath, or should I be using a certain setting? (Note, some of my entries will have volume, number, andissue fields, and I suppose all should be displayed in this case still.)
P.S. Thanks for your great work on creating this style.
Here is the relevant entry from my Biber (
.bib
) file.This renders as such using the default biblatex-bath settings:
The empty brackets after the volume and issue number are not desirable. I believe they are for the
issue
field, but I am (correctly, as I understand) using the numericalnumber
field instead.Is this a bug in biblatex-bath, or should I be using a certain setting? (Note, some of my entries will have
volume
,number
, andissue
fields, and I suppose all should be displayed in this case still.)P.S. Thanks for your great work on creating this style.