search

alex-nicat / ietf-dprive-phase2-requirements

Repo to work on the DPRIVE phase 2 requirements draft
0 stars 3 forks source link

Some JL edits - requirements #16

Closed jlivingood closed 4 years ago

jlivingood commented 4 years ago

Last of my edits before the IETF-106 draft cutoff date. I think we can keep iterating here after the cutoff.

Ref Issues: https://github.com/alex-nicat/ietf-dprive-phase2-requirements/issues/7

jlivingood commented 4 years ago

Not yet my final edits! ;-)

bjovereinder commented 4 years ago

Should we remove the distinction between root/tld/sld authoritative name servers and their priority/risk?

bjovereinder commented 4 years ago

DNS software (currently) doesn't make the distinction between root, tld or sld, and it seems to me more an operational than protocol requirement?

jlivingood commented 4 years ago

IMO the operation of SLD, TLD, root are all so very different. So I think we should acknowledge that in the requirements, especially as I suspect they differ by each category and each will also implement on different timeframes and different manners.

jlivingood commented 4 years ago

So IMO leave it in as WG item for discussion at 106 & make an explicit point of discussion for our slides

bjovereinder commented 4 years ago

Okay. I understand, maybe I am too focussed on protocol requirements rather than general req for ADoT.

— Benno

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone

Op 4 nov. 2019 om 17:56 heeft Jason Livingood notifications@github.com het volgende geschreven:

 So IMO leave it in as WG item for discussion at 106 & make an explicit point of discussion for our slides

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.