Open chadagreene opened 4 months ago
Yes to h5 format (netCDF doesn't make a s much sense for a point data)
which variables are saved needs to be flexible as need is study dependent
Adding the ability for nc output in a flexible way is great. Also, however, I think it would be preferential if we don't remove the ability to output in .mat format, since it is a loss of nice functionality. Maybe an add an option to specify output type?
Yep, it should be easy to allow either output format based on the extension.
Currently, the
GEMB
function saves its output as in .mat format. The .mat format is wonderfully easy to work with in Matlab, and there are packages in most other languages that can read .mat, but I think this may be a good time to move away from the proprietary format.GEMB
to NetCDF format?S
?I'm hoping we can reduce the number of variables that are saved to "as much as necessary and nothing more".