Closed BillBrower closed 8 years ago
Interesting. I have a hypothesis about this.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Bill Brower notifications@github.com wrote:
I am running letsencrypt-aws from a docker container on an EC2 instance that is in the same VPC, and security group, as my ELB. Here is what it returns:
Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: Traceback (most recent call last): Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "letsencrypt-aws.py", line 572, in
Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: 2016-06-06 01:36:54 [startup] Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: 2016-06-06 01:36:55 [running] mode='persistent' Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: 2016-06-06 01:36:55 [updating-elb] elb_name=u'pigeon-staff-api-development' Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: cli() Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "/app/.venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/click/core.py", line 716, in call Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: return self.main(_args, _kwargs) Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "/app/.venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/click/core.py", line 696, in main Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: rv = self.invoke(ctx) Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "/app/.venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1060, in invoke Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx)) Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "/app/.venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/click/core.py", line 889, in invoke Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: return ctx.invoke(self.callback, _ctx.params) Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "/app/.venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/click/core.py", line 534, in invoke Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: return callback(_args, **kwargs) Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "letsencrypt-aws.py", line 526, in update_certificates Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: force_issue, certificate_requests Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "letsencrypt-aws.py", line 427, in update_elbs Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: cert_request, Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: File "letsencrypt-aws.py", line 346, in update_elb Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: expiration_date=current_cert.not_valid_after Jun 6 01:36:55 ip-192-168-0-166 docker/9aca4ed8a3f6[2651]: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'not_valid_after' At first, I was using an AWS certificate for port 443 on my target ELB, and I thought that might be the issue but I got the same error message after I removed it. I also looked at issue #38 https://github.com/alex/letsencrypt-aws/issues/38 but I have a hosted zone setup on Route53 for my domain so I'm not sure what the issue could be. Any chance you've seen this issue before? Any help would be much appreciated!
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/alex/letsencrypt-aws/issues/64, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAADBHI0IS3MtzBytJSYvujweZ7Ovun6ks5qI3zUgaJpZM4IugXd .
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero GPG Key fingerprint: D1B3 ADC0 E023 8CA6
@BillBrower Ok. I think I fixed this. Let me know if it still fails.
Will do, thanks Alex!
Edit: That fixed it.
I am running letsencrypt-aws from a docker container on an EC2 instance that is in the same VPC, and security group, as my ELB. Here is what it returns:
At first, I was using an AWS certificate for port 443 on my target ELB, and I thought that might be the issue but I got the same error message after I removed it. I also looked at issue #38 but I have a hosted zone setup on Route53 for my domain so I'm not sure what the issue could be. Any chance you've seen this issue before? Any help would be much appreciated!