Closed eebasso closed 3 years ago
I can see you put some effort into this pull request, but we're really not interested in changing the way the hurdle rate is represented. I don't mean this to be discouraging, given that you proposed this and implemented the change in earnest. We discussed this internally and want to err on the side of presenting more information rather than less, even if that means numbers like the hurdle rate become (humorously) large.
Yeah I think more information is good. Maybe the cap should not be at 100%. But the information has to be capped at some point right? Otherwise it will blow up off the charts. You could set the cap at 1000% or 10000% or whatever you want. You can use my code to do that if you decide that's what you want to do in the future. Obviously all you'd need to change is the 1 to a 10 or 100 and change the wording to "1000%" or "10000%." I had fun making this PR, it's okay if it doesn't get used.
The hurdles will grow beyond 100%. Should we cap them there or at 1000%? Currently this should do it at 100%. Simple change. Sorry for being noob, this is my first pull request.