Closed jwilk closed 5 years ago
3.4 is the minimum version of Python 3 we currently support (at least, based on our travis CI config), so I don't think this is necessary. Do you disagree?
Before bc214723afd2e456b243de094fd5ee2ea322b753, rply worked fine with Python 3.2, even if that was not officially supported. Personally, I don't have any use for rply on Python 3.0-3.2. I submitted this because the code was misleading to human readers, and it was trivial to fix.
Ok, I guess I'll merge it, as it does not harm. (If we were using six.PY3
or something like that, I'd say no :-)).
Abstract base classes were moved from
collections
tocollections.abc
only in Python 3.3.