The PR adds a unit test to validate the support of expressions, ie 75% in some annotated fields.
Motivation and Context
There was a fix in our model generators that caused deserialization errors when these expressions were used in this manner. The issue has been resolved, adding a test here to confirm the behavior and prevent regression.
Testing
tests pass locally + tests without the fix fail.
Also it was confirmed (by Shreyas) with the team reporting this issue that the fix worked.
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Types of changes
[ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
Checklist
[x] My code follows the code style of this project
[ ] My change requires a change to the documentation
[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
[x] I have read the README document
[x] I have added tests to cover my changes
[tbd] All new and existing tests passed
License
[x] By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
… and strings expressions
Description
The PR adds a unit test to validate the support of expressions, ie 75% in some annotated fields.
Motivation and Context
There was a fix in our model generators that caused deserialization errors when these expressions were used in this manner. The issue has been resolved, adding a test here to confirm the behavior and prevent regression.
Testing
tests pass locally + tests without the fix fail. Also it was confirmed (by Shreyas) with the team reporting this issue that the fix worked.
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Types of changes
Checklist
License