Closed rico0260 closed 1 year ago
Hi @rico0260,
Yes, Fibaro device model is exactly like you described => the battery interface is assigned to each child device, and not exposed as a single sensor for a physical device.
The QuickApp goal is to rely on Fibaro device model, not invent a replacement for what Fibaro does. This is why multiple battery sensors created in Home Assistant.
This looks like a usability/aesthetics issue, not as a functional defect, with several solutions possible:
Hi,
Here is a Fibaro Motion sensor - exposed devicesin Fibaro are Motion and Lux, rest are hidden.
as it should , the motion has a battery sensor.
The Lux does not.
Can you please post some pics of the setup of that device in Fibaro and what goes in HA ?
Hello, that would be perfect, but for the moment it's not worth it, because there are other more important things to settle.
Then we close the issue for now
I have the impression that for each device on battery, a new battery entity is created for each child entity. Shouldn't we create a battery entity linked to the parent, to no longer have multiple battery entities for each device?