Closed thisisparker closed 3 weeks ago
Thanks for this @thisisparker . Have you encountered a puzzle in the wild that does not provide a solution? Would be nice to add to tests. thx
I have created puzzles that have this bit set, and testers have confirmed that it does lead to some "expected" different behavior in e.g. Across Lite — in particular, as I mentioned above, the "reveal" options are not provided, and the completion screen expresses some uncertainty about whether you've completed the puzzle. For that to work, though, the solution bits still needed to be filled, and I did so with X
es as is conventional.
Happy to share one such puzzle if it would help for testing! But I didn't really encounter it in the wild. To be honest I was surprised to learn about this SolutionState before opening this issue.
I would be interested in getting a copy of the test file. Puzzazz does respect this flag, but we've never seen a puzzle that has it. It's largely irrelevant because Puzzazz also automatically detects puzzles with redacted solutions. e.g., all Xes. (send to @.***) Also, FYI, we chose to not support unscrambling. It seemed to us that nobody was scrambling puzzles any more. Haven't seen one in many years.
This is not well documented but one of the values in the SolutionState bit at
0x32
is0x0002
, which indicates that the solution is not present in the file. In practice I think almost every client treats it just about the same as0x0004
in that spot (suppressing or disabling "reveal" tools) but it may be the case that some clients will correctly not offer an attempt to unscramble either.