Closed developer-guy closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your suggestion.
Just like on #613 this proposal is missing context, use-cases and pros/cons.
Please take a few moments to add some meat to the bones here.
I know you're aware of the contribution guide, but please don't send a PR for either of these until they have approval and are marked as accepted.
/set title: Feature request: Integrate with the Cosign project for arkade releases
/add label: enhancement
We still haven't had any of the requested information added by the requestor.
From looking at the links, this is for signing containers only, however cosign sign-blob
may potentially be used to generate a signature for the binaries, which would then need to be uploaded to a registry.
I'll close for now due to lack of interest from community, but open to revisiting in the future.
Expected Behaviour>
verifiable arkade binaries
Current Behaviour
There is no support for signing and verifying arkade binaries.
Are you a GitHub Sponsor (Yes/No?)
Check at https://github.com/sponsors/alexellis
Possible Solution
using cosign and GitHub Actions
Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
1. 2. 3. 4.
Context
Your Environment