Closed alexhernandezgarcia closed 7 months ago
Are you sure Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
is the best way forward?
NC
)NC
, CC-BY-SA
is not recommended: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/why-is-cc-by-sa-discouraged-for-codeApache 2.0 or MIT are more common for this type of work.
@josephdviviano may have feedback too
If you want this codebase to be used by those in industry for collaborations, Apache2 or MIT are the "standards".
I learned this the hard way. I accidentally blocked Flaviu from IBM from using torchgfn
because we had a GPL license! So we switched to Apache2
(Added a bibtex
citation at the end of the readme with cffconvert -f bibtex
-- see https://github.com/citation-file-format/cffconvert)
Alright, I don't know much about licenses, but I trust you all. Also, Pierre Luc needs a less restrictive license too to be able to contribute.
I have replaced the license file by an Apache 2.0 one.
@josephdviviano feel free to add your name to the list of contributors, citation files, etc.
merging to ensure tests pass (we can do this for all PRs going forward)
This PR adds a license file and a citation file.
License: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Citation: .cff format, created with cffinit.