Closed Livy-Inverse closed 2 years ago
No, we dont.
According to my experience, common end user always likes all-in-one application whose philosophy is different from operation system module design. And as current condition, you can use aria2, ariaNG, extension separatly since you know how to config.
Thanks for your advice.
I just realized Aria2 for Chrome
does not rely on AriaNG
to work. It has its own configuration parameters, and can send download links directly to aria2
. AriaNG
works as a "viewer" most of the time.
You're right. I think I can install another web interface such as WebUI-Aria2 and it will work just fine as another viewer. It is nice to have two GUIs at once.
Yes. You got it.
As with Unix philosophy "do one thing and do it well", I would like to ask if we can have a Chrome extension which only capture download links and send them to the AriaNG server? I mean we have 3 different things:
Of course we can combine all of them on a single PC. But personally, I think it would be better to split their functionalities into different components. The obvious benefit would be upgrading AriaNG independently of the extension.