Closed denouche closed 4 years ago
cc @Sadzeih if you have time to take a look...
That looks good, but it would be cool to have some tests. If you don't have time maybe I can write some.
Could we get this PR approved and merged?
Oh, I just merged this one but I see in #32 you are talking about this? So this feature was also included in #32 @Sadzeih ? So I can revert this PR maybe?
Yes I found a better way to deal with this that also works with what I implemented in #32. I don't think we need this PR anymore.
For custom types like:
For now the generated field looks like:
This PR make the field looks like: