Closed MarcoRavich closed 1 year ago
powerjungle
commented
1 year ago The LICENSE.md file can be split into LICENSE which contains only the legal terms for GNU GPLv3 and CREDITS.md which contains everything else from the file or something like that.
MarcoRavich
commented
1 year ago Hi there, thanks for the timely reply !
We've changed both badge (now shows "OWN") and link at the moment. Of course it would be great to have a "standard" GH licensing format.
We are sorting resources alphabetically (as you can see in DAWs and Libraries pages) but we recently decided to introduce a different - hopefully - more effective approach. Projects will be grouped+sorted in this "chain": Section > Subsection > Language > License > Name (alphabetical)
Check out the 1st test in the Generic subsection of the Editors page:
https://github.com/forart/HyMPS/blob/main/Aeditors.md#generic-
Do you think this new approach could better foster collaboration between devs ?
Thanks again and, if you like/need, let us know (by participating in our discussions) how we can support listed projects.
Last but not least, Happy New Year !
powerjungle
commented
1 year ago Hi there, thanks for the timely reply !
No problem, but I'm not actively part of the development.
We've changed both badge (now shows "OWN") and link at the moment.
Well, it's kinda misleading, because this project doesn't actually have it's "own" license. Although I don't have any ideas for a better name.
Do you think this new approach could better foster collaboration between devs ?
Me personally, I'm not sure. It's a good idea, but devs probably won't be thinking too much about it.
alexkay
commented
1 year ago The licence file clearly states it's GPLv3: https://github.com/alexkay/spek/blob/f209ec7c89c231754f5dedaf6d633de1a6fa996b/LICENCE.md?plain=1#L1-L4
However I can see GitHub is not detecting it correctly. #257 should fix this.
Hi there, 1st of all thanks for your awesome (voluntary) work !
Since we've doxed this git in our HyMPS project (under Editors - Tools section), can you please fix licensing terms for it ?
Our "problem" is that the relative license badge isn't generated correctly:
This could be easily fixed by choosing a "correct" license file through the GH's wizard.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, this may help other devs to understand how reuse your code in other open projects and vice-versa that's a determining factor for the success and longevity of your project.
Last but not least, let us know how - in your opinion - we could improve our categorizations and links to resources in order to favor collaboration between developers (and therefore evolution) of listed projects.
Thanks in advance.